Mass Incarceration
Dockery v. Hall
The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated "in a perpetual state of crisis" where prisoners are at "grave risk of death and loss of limbs." The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
View Case
Learn About Mass Incarceration
All Cases
158 Mass Incarceration Cases
Court Case
Oct 2008
Mass Incarceration
+3 老熟女午夜福利
Medina v. County of San Bernardino
On December 5, 2007, the ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of Jameelah Medina, a practicing Muslim woman who was forced by local deputies to remove her headscarf (hijab) while she was in custody in San Bernardino County's West Valley Detention Center.
Explore case
Court Case
Oct 2008
Mass Incarceration
+3 老熟女午夜福利
Medina v. County of San Bernardino
On December 5, 2007, the ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of Jameelah Medina, a practicing Muslim woman who was forced by local deputies to remove her headscarf (hijab) while she was in custody in San Bernardino County's West Valley Detention Center.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2008
Mass Incarceration
+4 老熟女午夜福利
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
Whether someone who was falsely imprisoned for 24 years based on the untrue testimony of a criminal informant can sue senior administrators in the prosecutor's office for their failure to maintain an even rudimentary record system that would have disclosed impeachment information about the informant prior to trial. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2008
Mass Incarceration
+4 老熟女午夜福利
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
Whether someone who was falsely imprisoned for 24 years based on the untrue testimony of a criminal informant can sue senior administrators in the prosecutor's office for their failure to maintain an even rudimentary record system that would have disclosed impeachment information about the informant prior to trial. DECIDED
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008
Mass Incarceration
Women's Rights
Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee
Whether Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which generally prohibits sex discrimination in federally-funded schools, bars public school students from also challenging sex discrimination as a violation of the Constitution.DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008
Mass Incarceration
Women's Rights
Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee
Whether Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which generally prohibits sex discrimination in federally-funded schools, bars public school students from also challenging sex discrimination as a violation of the Constitution.DECIDED
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008
Mass Incarceration
Criminal Law Reform
Pearson v. Callahan
Whether, absent an emergency, the Fourth Amendment permits the police to enter a home without a warrant based on an informant's signal that criminal activity is taking place inside. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008
Mass Incarceration
Criminal Law Reform
Pearson v. Callahan
Whether, absent an emergency, the Fourth Amendment permits the police to enter a home without a warrant based on an informant's signal that criminal activity is taking place inside. DECIDED
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2008
Mass Incarceration
Smart Justice
Boumediene v. Bush and Al Odah v. United States
Whether the detainees at Guant谩namo can be deprived of any meaningful right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention without charges or trial. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2008
Mass Incarceration
Smart Justice
Boumediene v. Bush and Al Odah v. United States
Whether the detainees at Guant谩namo can be deprived of any meaningful right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention without charges or trial. DECIDED