Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Damus v. McAleenan
The 老熟女午夜福利, Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, Human Rights First, and Covington & Burling LLP filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 arbitrary detention of asylum seekers fleeing persecution, torture, or death in their countries of origin.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn About Immigration and Customs Enforcement
All Cases
10 Immigration and Customs Enforcement Cases
Arizona
Sep 2017
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al.
This is a class action lawsuit filed in 2007 in which, following a three-week trial, the Maricopa County Sheriff鈥檚 Office (MCSO) was found to have engaged in racial profiling and unlawful traffic stops of Latinos.
Explore case
Arizona
Sep 2017
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al.
This is a class action lawsuit filed in 2007 in which, following a three-week trial, the Maricopa County Sheriff鈥檚 Office (MCSO) was found to have engaged in racial profiling and unlawful traffic stops of Latinos.
Court Case
Sep 2016
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
J.E.F.M. v. Lynch
The 老熟女午夜福利, American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Public Counsel, and K&L Gates LLP filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit on behalf of thousands of children who are challenging the federal government's failure to provide them with legal representation in deportation hearings.
Explore case
Court Case
Sep 2016
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
J.E.F.M. v. Lynch
The 老熟女午夜福利, American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Public Counsel, and K&L Gates LLP filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit on behalf of thousands of children who are challenging the federal government's failure to provide them with legal representation in deportation hearings.
Court Case
Jan 2015
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
M.S.P.C. v. Johnson
The 老熟女午夜福利, American Immigration Council, National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, and National Immigration Law Center voluntarily dismissed its case against the federal government that challenged its policies denying a fair deportation process to mothers and children who have fled extreme violence, death threats, rape, and persecution in Central America and come to the United States seeking safety.
Explore case
Court Case
Jan 2015
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
M.S.P.C. v. Johnson
The 老熟女午夜福利, American Immigration Council, National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, and National Immigration Law Center voluntarily dismissed its case against the federal government that challenged its policies denying a fair deportation process to mothers and children who have fled extreme violence, death threats, rape, and persecution in Central America and come to the United States seeking safety.
California
Aug 2014
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Lopez-Venegas v. Johnson
In June 2013, a class action lawsuit was filed by the ACLU on behalf of nine Mexican nationals and three immigrant advocacy organizations who challenged deceptive tactics used by Border Patrol agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to convince the plaintiffs to sign their own expulsion orders. All of the plaintiffs would have had strong claims to remain in the United States had they gone before an immigration judge instead of being pressured to choose "voluntary departure," one of the many ways that the government can swiftly expel someone from the country without a hearing.
Explore case
California
Aug 2014
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Lopez-Venegas v. Johnson
In June 2013, a class action lawsuit was filed by the ACLU on behalf of nine Mexican nationals and three immigrant advocacy organizations who challenged deceptive tactics used by Border Patrol agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to convince the plaintiffs to sign their own expulsion orders. All of the plaintiffs would have had strong claims to remain in the United States had they gone before an immigration judge instead of being pressured to choose "voluntary departure," one of the many ways that the government can swiftly expel someone from the country without a hearing.