老熟女午夜福利

SEATTLE 鈥� A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration鈥檚 attacks on Head Start, halting the Department of Health and Human Services鈥� (HHS) ban on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility, as well as mass office closures and layoffs at the Office of Head Start. These administrative actions had disrupted programs nationwide and hindered their ability to fulfil their mission of providing early education and care to young children from low-income families. 鈥淭his is a huge victory for kids!鈥� said Joel Ryan, executive director of the Washington State Head Start & Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program. 鈥淲hen a Head Start program has their funding withheld because of their efforts to provide effective education to children with autism, serve tribal members on a reservation, or treat all families with respect, it is an attack on the fundamental promise of the Head Start program 鈥� that even children who are furthest away from opportunity should be given the early education they need to succeed in school. Today鈥檚 decision puts a stop to this attack and allows us to focus on what matters most 鈥� supporting children and families.鈥� The ruling follows a previous preliminary injunction, which blocked a directive from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to shut out some immigrant families from participating in Head Start based on their immigration status. In April, the 老熟女午夜福利鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project, the ACLU of Washington, the ACLU of Illinois, the Impact Fund and co-counsel filed a lawsuit on behalf of Parent Voices Oakland, Family Forward Oregon, and the Head Start Associations of Washington state, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The lawsuit asks the court to stop the administration from gutting Head Start, enforcing its unconstitutional ban on programs that promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility, and shutting out families and children from Head Start based on immigration status. Below are statements from plaintiffs and litigators: 鈥淣o matter who they are or where they鈥檙e from, kids deserve the chance to succeed. Today鈥檚 decision ensures that Head Start providers can provide early education to children from diverse communities and backgrounds without the constant threat of being punished simply for following the requirements of the law,鈥� said Jennie Mauer, executive director of the Wisconsin Head Start Association. 鈥淣o provider should fear being shut down for providing disability-related services or language access 鈥� and no child should be deprived of critical services because of an unlawful and cruel directive.鈥� 鈥淗ead Start is essential to hundreds of thousands of low-income parents and caregivers being able to work, get an education, and provide for themselves and their families,鈥� said Isabelle Mussard, interim executive director for Parent Voices Oakland. 鈥淭he Head Start Act鈥檚 requirement to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate services means that all parents can be involved and engaged in their children鈥檚 learning. We are thrilled that today鈥檚 decision stops the administration from denying entire communities access to Head Start.鈥� 鈥淗ead Start providers work tirelessly each day to foster inclusive and supportive classrooms where every child 鈥� no matter their background 鈥� can learn, grow, and get ready for school. This decision makes clear that the Trump administration cannot continue its unlawful attacks on Head Start at the expense of children and families who rely on it most,鈥� said Linda Morris, senior staff attorney at the ACLU鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project. 鈥淲e will continue to fight for every Head Start family to ensure they have access to the education and care they need.鈥� 鈥淭his injunction protects access to education and opportunity for the most marginalized communities across the country,鈥� said Brent Low, staff attorney at the ACLU of Washington. 鈥淚t allows Head Start to continue its critical mission to serve young children and their families through programs that respond to the needs of the communities they serve.鈥� 鈥淭he vision of the Head Start Program 鈥� and the text of the legislation passed by Congress to authorize the program 鈥� specifically called on local programs to serve their entire community,鈥� said Allison Siebeneck, director of the Women鈥檚 and Reproductive Rights Project at the ACLU of Illinois. 鈥淐ongress has consistently voted to fund programs that advance equity, inclusion and accessibility to educational opportunities for people from diverse communities. The injunction issued in this case simply says that the Administration cannot wipe away this promise and specific text with their edicts.鈥� 鈥淐ongress established the Head Start program to ensure that every child has access to education during this crucial time in their lives,鈥� said Lori Rifkin, litigation director at the Impact Fund.鈥�鈥淚n striking down these illegal actions by the Trump Administration, the Court upheld the rule of law and protected the ability of Head Start agencies to effectively provide services to hundreds of thousands of children across the country.鈥� You can find the ruling here.

The Trump Administration is threatening the future of Head Start, a program that has provided critical and evidence-based services 鈥� from education to childcare 鈥� to more than 40 million children and their families. The Administration by gutting Head Start staff and resources, delaying funding, and prohibiting activities that 鈥渁dvance or promote鈥� 鈥渄iversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility,鈥� is irreparably harming the young children and low-income families who rely on Head Start.