At Liberty Podcast
At Liberty Podcast
How the Supreme Court Could Silence Black Voters
September 29, 2022
On October 4th, the Supreme Court is set to hear Milligan v. Merrill, a case that would undermine Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. At question is Alabama’s new congressional map, a map that underwent what is called racial gerrymandering or racial redistricting, diluting Black Alabamans’ voting power.
The case’s outcome will determine the future of voting rights in America. Joining us today, our plaintiff in the case Shalela Dowdy, Organizer, Veteran, law student and resident of Mobile and Davin Rosborough, Senior Staff Attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project who is on the litigation team for the case.
In this episode
Kendall Ciesemier
Former Host of At Liberty and Senior Executive Producer of Multimedia
This Episode Covers the Following Ůҹ
Related Content
-
CaliforniaNov 2025
Voting Rights
United States V. Page. Explore Case.United States v. Page
Representing the League of Women Voters of California, the League of Women Voters of Orange Coast, and the League of Women Voters of North Orange County, the ACLU Voting Rights Project, ACLU of Northern California, and ACLU of Southern California have filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that Orange County, California turn over unredacted voter information, including voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license numbers and partial social security numbers.Status: Ongoing -
Ůҹ & CommentaryNov 2025
Voting Rights
2025 Elections: Voters Came Out In Record Numbers To Defend Key Civil Liberties Ůҹ Across The Country. Explore Ůҹ & Commentary.2025 Elections: Voters Came Out in Record Numbers to Defend Key Civil Liberties Ůҹ Across the Country
In big wins for civil liberties to protect abortion access and voting rights, and defy fearmongering, voters built the momentum needed to carry the fight forward to future elections.By: Emily Passini -
Ůҹ & CommentaryNov 2025
Voting Rights
Your Questions Answered: How To Vote Amid Trump's Attacks On Elections. Explore Ůҹ & Commentary.Your Questions Answered: How to Vote Amid Trump's Attacks on Elections
ACLU experts explain how to cast your ballot while the Trump administration challenges our most valuable democratic process.By: Hibah Ansari -
Press ReleaseOct 2025
Voting Rights
Court Strikes Down Key Part Of Trump’s Unlawful Voting Executive Order, Permanently Blocking Show-your-papers Requirement. Explore Press Release.Court Strikes Down Key Part of Trump’s Unlawful Voting Executive Order, Permanently Blocking Show-Your-Papers Requirement
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal court today issued a decisive ruling in League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump, permanently blocking a provision of President Trump’s March voting executive order that sought to add a requirement to show a passport or similar document proving citizenship when registering to vote with the federal voter registration form that would disproportionately impact voters of color. The decision grants summary judgment to the plaintiffs, finding that the President lacks the authority to unilaterally alter election procedures — powers that rest with Congress and the states. The ruling makes permanent the preliminary injunction issued in the case in April, and reaffirms a foundational principle of American democracy: no president can violate the separation of powers to change our elections and erect barriers that disenfranchise eligible voters. In a joint statement, plaintiffs and counsel, who are a coalition of voting and civil rights organizations, said: “The court’s ruling confirms what we have long argued: the President may not rewrite election law to impose a burdensome show-your-papers rule that would shut out countless Americans from the ballot box. This executive order was an attempted overreach of power, bypassing the Constitution’s clear allocation of authority to Congress and the states to set election rules. Our democracy is strongest when every eligible voter can register and vote free from expensive and unnecessary requirements.” The League of Women Voters Education Fund, League of Women Voters of the United States, League of Women Voters of Arizona, Hispanic Federation, NAACP, OCA-Asian Pacific American Advocates, and Asian and Pacific Islander Vote are represented by the Ůҹ, ACLU of D.C., Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and LatinoJustice PRLDEF. A link to the court’s opinion is here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2025/10/MSJ-Opinion.pdf A link to the court’s order is here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2025/10/217-Order-Granting-MSJ.pdfAffiliate: Washington, D.C.