Lives First, Profits Later: How To Close the Global Vaccine Gap
June 8, 2021
In the U.S., itās easy to think weāre in the final chapter of this global pandemic. Baseball stadiums have replaced cardboard cutouts with screaming fans, and the aroma of fresh popcorn is wafting once again from movie theatersā open doors. As of this recording, more than 60% of US adults have now received at least one dose of the vaccine, and unused doses are available to anyone over the age of 12.
But the U.S. is, in many ways, an outlier. The entire continent of Africa accounts for 1% of the worldās vaccine administrations, and countries in Asia and South America still lack meaningful access to vaccines. Added to this, variants have made COVID-19 more contagious and, in some cases, more deadly. This is the global vaccine gap.
The global vaccine gap is both a human rights and a racial justice issue. Many of the communities left vulnerable are communities of color. The scale of the problem has united activists and organizations from around the world, including at the ACLU, to identify solutions and fast.
For many of the human rights activists and experts, the urgency is part of their lived experience on the ground. This episode, weāll hear some of their stories and learn from one of the ACLUās human rights experts what needs to be done.
Special thanks to the International Network for Civil Liberties Organizations (INCLO) for helping make this podcast happen, especially Colin Gonsalves, Nersan Govender, Vivian Newman, and Lucila Santos.
To support our INCLO partners featured in this episode, please see below.
Human Rights Law Network in India: .
Legal ĄĻŹģÅ®Īēҹø£Ąū Centre in South Africa:
Dejusticia in Colombia:
INCLO:
This Episode Covers the Following ĄĻŹģÅ®Īēҹø£Ąū
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseDec 2025
Human Rights
Aclu Warns Fifa Risks Becoming Stage For Authoritarianism As President Trump Awarded Inaugural āpeace Prizeā. Explore Press Release.ACLU Warns FIFA Risks Becoming Stage For Authoritarianism As President Trump Awarded Inaugural āPeace Prizeā
WASHINGTON ā FIFA, the international soccer governing body, awarded President Trump today the inaugural FIFA āPeace Prizeā during its World Cup draw at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. In response to this news, Jamil Dakwar, director of the Human Rights Program at the ĄĻŹģÅ®Īēҹø£Ąū, had the following reaction: āAttacks on immigrants and those visiting the United States are at an all-time high. ICE is conducting raids across the country, tearing families apart, deporting thousands, without due process, and holding an unprecedented number in inhumane detention centers, including on military bases. The host cities of the upcoming World Cup are among the most heavily impacted ā with cities like Los Angeles and Chicago facing extreme surveillance, National Guard deployment and immigration enforcement activity. The Trump administration actions threaten our communities and tourists-fans alike ā and FIFA has unique leverage to push for change not to whitewash and capitulate.ā āThis tournament should be about celebrating unity and our connection to the world ā but by giving President Trump trophy instead of a red card, FIFA risks becoming a stage for authoritarianism.ā -
Press ReleaseDec 2025
Human Rights
World Cup 2026: Fifa Needs To Act On Human Rights. Explore Press Release.World Cup 2026: FIFA Needs to Act on Human Rights
WASHINGTON ā FIFA, the international soccer governing body, needs to match its lofty rhetoric on rights with concrete action, a coalition of human rights organizations, trade unions, and fans groups said today. FIFA is holding its World Cup draw at the Kennedy Center in Washington on December 5, 2025, and awarding its first āFIFA Peace Prize.ā The Sport & Rights Alliance, Dignity 2026, ACLU, AFL-CIO, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Independent Supporters Council, NAACP, Athlete Ally and Reporters Without Borders have come together to press FIFA to deliver a World Cup that respects the rights of fans, players, workers, journalists, and local communities. The 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup, co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, represents an opportunity to implement a new model for FIFA eventsāone that supports strong workersā protections, safeguards childrenās rights, upholds media freedom, and ensures that working people and communities benefit from hosting this mega-sporting event, the groups said. āWorkers, athletes, fans, and communities make the World Cup possible,ā said Andrea Florence, executive director of the Sport & Rights Alliance. āThe 2026 World Cup is the first to begin with human rights criteria embedded in the bidding process. But the deteriorating human rights situation in the United States has put those commitments at risk.ā With 200 days until kickoff, the escalating attacks on immigrants in the United States, FIFAās cancellation of anti-discrimination messaging, and threats to press freedom and the rights of peaceful protesters signal a tournament heading in the wrong direction, the human rights and labor groups said. There has ben no transparency around FIFAās Peace Prize process. Human Rights Watch has written to FIFA to request a list of the nominees, the judges, the criteria, and the process for the Peace Prize. Human Rights Watch received no response. āFIFAās so-called peace prize is being awarded against a backdrop of violent detentions of immigrants, national guard deployments in US cities, and the obsequious cancellation of FIFAās own anti-racism and anti-discrimination campaigns,ā said Minky Worden, who oversees sport for Human Rights Watch. āThere is still time to honor FIFAās promises for a World Cup not tainted by human rights abuses, but the clock is ticking.ā āThe Trump administration has aggressively pursued a systematic anti-human rights campaign to target, detain, and disappear immigrants in communities across the US ā including the deployment of the National Guard in cities where the World Cup will take place,ā said Jamil Dakwar, human rights director at the ACLU. āFIFAās own policy states that they will leverage their business relationships to mitigate adverse human rights impacts ā and itās critical that they wield that influence to end rights violations including freedom of speech and assembly rights. We call on FIFA to honor its human rights commitments, not capitulate to Trumpās authoritarianism.ā As part of FIFAās human rights framework for the 2026 World Cup, each of the 16 host cities is required to develop its own āhuman rights action planā to prevent discrimination, support workersā rights, protet chldren, and combat human trafficking. Human Rights Watch, along with the Sport & Rights Alliance, Dignity 2026, and their member organizations, are calling on FIFA and host committees to: Reinstate anti-discrimination messaging; Commit to ensuring effective protections against racial profiling, arbitrary detention, and unlawful immigration enforcement during the tournament; Work closely with community partners on finalizing the Human Rights Action Plans; Take effective steps to ensure respect for the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful protest; Announce and implement a comprehensive Child Safeguarding Policy; Ensure meaningful community benefit from the 2026 World Cup; and Take effective steps to ensure that the 2026 World Cup does not lead to abuses of vulnerable communities, including the jailing of unhoused populations. Quotes from civil society experts are as follows: "The 2026 World Cup is an opportunity to show that mega-sporting events can be delivered without exploiting workers," said Cathy Feingold, international director at the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), and International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) deputy president. "From stadium construction to match day operations, workers at every level deserve fair wages, safe conditions, and the right to organize. FIFA cannot claim to celebrate peace while ignoring the conditions of the people who make these games possible. We need binding commitments, not just promises." āEvery four years, billions of people turn their attention to the World Cup and its host countries,ā said Clayton Weimers, executive director, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) USA. āThey rely on journalists to deliver reliable information with appropriate context to tell the story of this tournament both on and off the field. Unfortunately, journalists in the US are seeing their access restricted, their visas threatened, and their safety put into question. FIFA and the host governments must guarantee the freedom and safety of journalists before, during, and after the 2026 World Cup.ā āAttending a soccer match should never result in arbitrary detention or deportation," said Daniel NoroƱa, Americas advocacy director, Amnesty International USA. "The threat of immigration enforcement at Club World Cup venues is deeply troubling, and FIFA cannot be silent. FIFA must obtain binding guarantees from US authorities that the tournament will be a safe space for all, regardless of immigration status.ā āFIFA's decision to cancel anti-racism and anti-discrimination messaging at the Club World Cup sent a chilling signal to communities of color and all who have fought for equality in sport,ā said Jamal Watkins, senior vice president of strategy and advancement, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). āAt a time when hate crimes are rising and DEI programs are under attack, FIFA should not be retreating.ā āAs an out athlete, I know what it means to compete in environments where you're not sure you'll be safe,ā said Matthew Pacifici, former men's professional player in the US and Athlete Ally ambassador. āLGBTQ+ players and fans need more than symbolic gesturesāwe need enforceable protections. The homophobic chants at the Club World Cup in Atlanta show exactly why FIFA's retreat from anti-discrimination messaging is so dangerous. Players and fans must know that FIFA will protect them, not abandon them.ā āSupporters are the backbone of this sport, yet FIFA keeps making decisions about our safety without ever talking to the people who actually show up,ā said Bailey Brown, president, Independent Supporters Council. āYou cannot claim to 'unite the world' while shutting out the very fans who bring the energy and passion to every match. Weāre asking for something simple: transparency, real consultation, and concrete protections for every supporter at the 2026 World Cup.ā āIt is unacceptable that FIFA has no child safeguarding policy for the 2026 World Cup,ā said Katherine La Puente, childrenās rights coordinator at Human Rights Watch. āRisks children can face in the context of major sporting events include trafficking, sexual exploitation, child labor, and family displacements, among other forms of violence and abuse.ā āFor the World Cup to truly 'unite the world,' both FIFA and host committees need to ensure that the rights and dignity of everyone, whether residents or visitors, are protected and not exploited,ā said Jennifer Li, coordinator of Dignity 2026 and director of the Center for Community Health Innovation at Georgetown Law. āFor example, people who are unsheltered should not be criminalized for their status or displaced as part of so-called beautification efforts. FIFA and host cities have a responsibility to ensure that hosting communities benefit from this event, and that the most vulnerable residents do not bear the greatest costs.ā -
ĄĻŹģÅ®Īēҹø£Ąū & CommentaryNov 2025
Privacy & Technology
+3 ĄĻŹģÅ®Īēҹø£Ąū
Face Recognition And The ātrump Terrorā: A Marriage Made In Hell. Explore ĄĻŹģÅ®Īēҹø£Ąū & Commentary.Face Recognition and the āTrump Terrorā: A Marriage Made in Hell
ICE and CBP are smashing their way not only through car windows but also through any constraints on the use of face recognitionBy: Jay Stanley -
Press ReleaseNov 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Human Rights
Immigrants Sue Trump Administration Over Inhumane Conditions At Californiaās Largest Immigration Detention Center. Explore Press Release.Immigrants Sue Trump Administration Over Inhumane Conditions at Californiaās Largest Immigration Detention Center
SAN FRANCISCO ā Seven people detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sued the Trump administration over inhumane conditions at Californiaās largest immigration detention center, the privately owned California City Detention Facility located in Kern County. The plaintiffs, who seek to represent a class of all people held at California City, describe in their complaint: Punishing conditions including dirty housing units, inadequate food and water, very cold temperatures, and restrictions on family visits Enforced isolation caused by frequent lockdowns, no access to programming, and excessive solitary confinement Terrifyingly inadequate medical care that deprives people of critical treatment for cancer, life-threatening heart conditions, diabetes and other serious medical needs Neglect of people with disabilities including failing to provide sign language interpreters, wheelchairs, and other necessities people need to live safely Encroachment on freedom of religion, including confiscation of prayer mats, head coverings and even holy texts Denial of access to counsel, with weeks-long delays for legal calls and long waits for in-person visits California City previously operated as a state prison managed by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. ICE contracted with the for-profit company CoreCivic to re-open the prison as an immigration detention center this year. Since its re-opening, it has come under intense criticism, with people detained at California City describing the facility as a ātorture chamber,ā and community members expressing outrage over its deplorable conditions. Detained people also have engaged in numerous sit-ins and hunger strikes, including in mid-September, when over 100 people across several housing pods engaged in collective action to demand an end to many of the abuses the lawsuit challenges. Sokhean Keo, a named plaintiff in the lawsuit, said, āI'm bringing this lawsuit to try to help end the suffering and pain that I see in here. ICE is playing with people's lives, and they treat people like they're trash, like they're nothing. Some of the people I'm detained with don't even have soap ā they take showers without soap ā and they're losing weight because they don't have enough to eat. This is bigger than me, but filing this lawsuit feels like something I can do to call for help for myself and everyone else here.ā The lawsuit, Gomez Ruiz, et al. v. ICE, was filed in the U.S. District Court of Northern California and seeks to redress violations of the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and the Rehabilitation Act. The plaintiffs are represented by the Prison Law Office, Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP, the ĄĻŹģÅ®Īēҹø£Ąū, and the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice. Gustavo Guevara, also a named plaintiff, added, āNo human being, immigrant or not, should be subjected to these horrendous conditions. I hope society becomes aware of the abuse, neglect, indifference, and the overall unjust treatment we are being subjected to, and does not turn a blind eye. Itās not right that because weāre immigrants they feel they can treat us this way.ā ICE began quietly transferring people to the facility in late August. Just four weeks after its opening, Disability Rights California conducted a monitoring visit and found that California City āfails to meet peopleās basic needs,ā fails to āprovide access to critical medicalā care, and āemploys staff who harassā detained people. With 2,560 beds, the facility is the largest immigration detention center in California. At the time of filing, more than 800 people were detained in the facility. CoreCivic projects it will reach full capacity by early 2026 as ICE continues to admit new arrivals on a daily basis as part of the Trump administrationās unprecedented mass arrests of community members and expansion of ICE detention. Additional quotes from co-counsel are as follows: āThe treatment of the people held in the California City facility is yet another example of ICEās utter disregard for the rights and dignity of people in its custody,ā said Kyle Virgien, senior staff attorney at the ACLUās National Prison Project. āAccess to necessities like food, basic medical care, and counsel arenāt mere suggestions ā they are constitutionally protected rights that all people in detention are entitled to.ā āEight hundred people are currently locked up in the Mojave Desert in conditions no society should tolerate, and by all accounts, that number is about to triple,ā said Tess Borden, supervising staff attorney at the Prison Law Office. āOur clients are bringing this lawsuit to seek constitutionally adequate conditions of confinement for the hundreds of people at California City and the hundreds more to come, and to shine a light onto the abuses occurring within the ever-expanding immigration detention system in our country.ā āWhat is happening at California City is punitive and unconstitutional,ā emphasized Steven P. Ragland, partner at Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP. āPeople held there are being denied basic human rights, dignity and due process, and we are committed to fixing these horrendous conditions and holding the government accountable.ā āAs our phones are flooded with videos of federal agents arresting our neighbors with extreme violence and cruelty, the brave plaintiffs in this suit remind us through their constant struggle for justice that the abuse does not end there, but continues out of view of the cameras, behind the walls of places like California City Detention Facility,ā said Priya Patel, Supervising Attorney at the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice. The complaint is available here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2025/11/11.12.25-Calcity-Complaint-filed.pdf