At Liberty Podcast
At Liberty Podcast
We鈥檙e Still Ready: Trump鈥檚 First 100 Days with Cecillia Wang
May 9, 2025
We talk a lot on At Liberty about knowing our rights, but since Donald Trump returned to office, where do those rights stand? This week, the ACLU鈥檚 National Legal Director Cecillia Wang joins Kamau to make sense of Trump鈥檚 first 100 days, from the more than 140 executive orders he signed to the more than 100 legal actions the ACLU has filed since January. Plus, listeners share their questions on immigration rights, freedom of speech, and how we can stay prepared for what鈥檚 ahead.
In this episode
This Episode Covers the Following 老熟女午夜福利
Related Content
-
Kentucky Supreme CourtDec 2025
Civil Liberties
Commonwealth V. Davis And Commonwealth V. Kentucky Education Association. Explore Case.Commonwealth v. Davis and Commonwealth v. Kentucky Education Association
This case asks whether Kentucky鈥檚 legislature can legally favor some unions by giving them preferential treatment and disfavor others. A recent law does just that: SB 7 prohibits public employers from allowing their employees to use payroll deductions for union dues yet expressly exempts law enforcement and fire protection unions from this prohibition. Two state circuit courts and the Court of Appeals have held that this law violates the Kentucky Constitution鈥檚 equal protection guarantee. The State now appeals to the Kentucky Supreme Court. The Court鈥檚 decision has important implications for equal protection, free speech, and labor rights in Kentucky.Status: Ongoing -
老熟女午夜福利 & CommentaryNov 2025
Civil Liberties
Defending Veterans鈥 Rights For Over A Century. Explore 老熟女午夜福利 & Commentary.Defending Veterans鈥 Rights for Over a Century
This Veterans Day, we renew our commitment to ensuring that the rights of those who serve are honored and protected.By: Aaron Madrid Aksoz -
PodcastNov 2025
National Security
+2 老熟女午夜福利
Deployments At Our Doorstep. Explore Podcast.Deployments At Our Doorstep
By: ACLU -
Rhode Island Supreme CourtOct 2025
Civil Liberties
Parente Et Al. V. Lefebvre Et Al.. Explore Case.Parente et al. v. Lefebvre et al.
This case asks whether state officials in Rhode Island can be held liable for their discriminatory acts under the Rhode Island Civil Rights Act (RICRA), a state anti-discrimination law. The State of Rhode Island asserts that it has sovereign immunity as to claims brought under the RICRA and therefore cannot be sued for damages for violating that law. The State Supreme Court Initiative and the ACLU of Rhode Island filed an amicus brief arguing that the State is wrong: discrimination claims under the RICRA are covered by the State Tort Claims Act鈥檚 broad waiver of state sovereign immunity for 鈥渁ll actions of torts.鈥 Thus, state officials may be held liable when they engage in discrimination prohibited by the RICRA, allowing harmed Rhode Islanders to seek redress.Status: Ongoing